Author: James Robertson
Date: 07:08:47 03/12/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 12, 1999 at 01:31:29, blass uri wrote: > >On March 12, 1999 at 00:22:20, Charles Unruh wrote: > >> Deep Blue >> >>"New allegations Kasparov/IBM >> >>Kasparov made new allegations against IBM concerning "Deep Blue" two years after >>the match. "IBM cheated me. >>Their computer was a fake", he said in an interview, which will appear in the >>German internet magazin "Konr@d". >>Kasparow says Deep Blue was manipulated and human beings must have interfered. >>(Message from French news >>agency Agence France Press / Donnerstag 11. März 1999 - 14:34 Uhr © AFP 1999) - >>3/11/99" >> >> >>It is unfortunate that this would be getting published just as kasp is on top of >>the world. He should just move on regardless of what happened it's over. I >>have no doubt that kasp was and is a stronger player than Deep Blue was(though >>not necessarily as consistant, but then again DB's first loss did demonstrate(by >>the play"the kIA game") a strength level beneath several of the top 10 GM's). >>This is just to say that either Anand or Kramnik could win a 6 game match >>against Kasparov(well a year ago anyway he's a super monster today). Further >>that if Kasparov had played the blunder he played in the last round against deep >>blue 80%+ of all GM's would have saw the simple sack to win instantly in but >>seconds. > >The simple sacrifice was not a winning sacrifice. Just after the match, I read an article that stated that "A quick look into the databases shows that White won in 7 out of 8 games, and in the 8th Black needed a large slice of luck." I don't know what this means, but it seems the author thinks the sacrifice is correct. James >The problem was that kasparov did not prepare for it because fxe6 instead of Qe7 >is probably winning. > >I do not believe that IBM cheated kasparov by moves of humans but I do not think >that kasparov is the bad guy of this story. > >I feel that IBM cheat the public by not playing with deeper blue. > >I read in the newspaper in the first match of deep blue against kasparov that >they refused to draw in the 5th game because they saw it as a scientific >experiment. > >Now they stopped this experiment. > >They made a wrong impression that they wanted to play when the truth was that >they wanted only to win and stop to play. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.