Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:39:03 10/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2005 at 16:25:14, Christian Koch wrote: >>Do you plan to give some evaluation improvements in the next update >>that are not related to this problem or do you plan to give only update for >>tablebases support. > >How should the evaluation improvements look like? Please post some suggestions >with reliable examples. > >Only tablebase support is not good enough for a next free release? I did not complain I only asked about it. I do not claim to know how should evaluation improvements look like(except maybe evaluation of some basic endgames like KQ vs KP and even if the program use tablebases it is still productive because the program cannot evaluate tablebases positions at every node) but I know that Fabien plans to improve the evaluation based on an email that he sent me. I do not know if he had success in it. I do not know if he know if he is going to have success in it in the time of the next release. I do not know if he plans to implement it in the next update in case that he has success in it. I am sorry that some people consider every question that I ask as a personal attack. I could ask Fabien by email but I think that it is information that may be interesting to other posters so I did not do it but maybe it is better that I ask question by email because every question that I ask here is understood as personal attack by at least one of the CEGT testers. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.