Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 16:01:22 10/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2005 at 16:51:43, James C. Logan wrote:
>Obviously strange behavior. I have read all the posts, but does anyone know if
>Fritz 9 would actually make these bad moves when playing?
Yes of course it does.
[Event ", 40'/40+40'/40+40'40 n1 yt1 F9"]
[Site "?"]
[Date "2005.10.15"]
[Round "2"]
[White "Fritz 9"]
[Black "The King 3.33"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B33"]
[Annotator "0.04;-0.25"]
[PlyCount "128"]
{W=14.2 ply; 1.361kN/s; 21.339 TBAs B=11.7 ply; 392kN/s} 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 3.
d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nc6 5. Nb5 Nf6 6. N1c3 d6 7. Bf4 e5 8. Bg5 a6 9. Na3 b5 10.
Bxf6 gxf6 11. Nd5 f5 12. c3 Bg7 13. exf5 Bxf5 {Beide letzter Buchzug} 14. Qf3 {
0.04/14 162} Be6 {-0.25/12 93} 15. Nf4 {(Ld3) 0.06/14 87} d5 {-0.12/12 100} 16.
Nxe6 {-0.03/15 148} fxe6 {-0.11/11 28} 17. Qh5+ {-0.03/14 70} Kd7 {
(Kf8) -0.19/12 41} 18. Nc2 {(Le2) 0.23/13 59} Qe8 {(Tf8) -0.32/12 91} 19. Qe2 {
(Dxe8+) 0.07/14 97} e4 {(Df8) -0.49/11 90} 20. a4 {(0-0-0) 0.14/13 96} Qg6 {
-0.86/11 92} 21. h4 {(axb5) -0.07/13 98} Rhf8 {(Se5) -0.87/10 71} 22. axb5 {
-0.03/13 92} axb5 {-0.82/11 61} 23. Rxa8 {-0.48/14 98} Rxa8 {-0.95/11 32} 24.
Qd1 {(De3) -0.54/14 80} Ra2 {(b4) -1.07/11 78} 25. Qb1 {-0.66/15 140} e3 {
-0.98/12 90} 26. Kd1 {-0.83/14 56} Ra4 {(Ta7) -0.96/11 92} 27. fxe3 {
-0.11/13 61} b4 {-0.79/11 97} 28. h5 {(Kd2) -0.69/13 154} Qe4 {-0.91/12 84} 29.
Bb5 {(h6) -0.48/13 75} bxc3 {-1.11/11 59} 30. bxc3 {-0.59/14 65} Qxg2 {
(Lxc3) -0.85/11 53} 31. Rf1 {-0.32/14 82} Bxc3 {-0.89/11 87} 32. Be2 {
-0.41/14 65} d4 {-0.82/11 92} 33. Qb5 {-0.85/13 66} Ra5 {-0.96/11 86} 34. Qb7+
{-1.09/14 68} Kd6 {-1.41/12 61} 35. Rf7 {-1.02/14 66} Qh1+ {-1.43/11 91} 36.
Rf1 {-1.52/14 120} Qe4 {-1.54/11 76} 37. Rf7 {(exd4) -1.11/14 144} dxe3 {
(Ta7) -1.59/10 60} 38. Qd7+ {-1.51/15 41} Kc5 {-1.49/12 94} 39. Qd3 {
-1.45/16 91} Qh1+ {-1.49/11 89} 40. Rf1 {-1.52/14 7} Qd5 {-1.42/12 51} 41.
Qxd5+ {-1.50/16 115} exd5 {-1.55/12 52} 42. Nxe3 {(Tf7) -1.54/15 63} Ra1+ {
-1.64/11 72} 43. Kc2 {-1.50/11 1} Ra3 {-1.54/12 88} 44. Kd1 {-1.58/15 84} Ba5 {
-1.58/12 129} 45. Nc2 {-1.62/16 112} Rb3 {-1.59/12 81} 46. Ba6 {
(Kc1) -1.61/15 155} h6 {(Th3) -1.80/11 51} 47. Rf8 {(Kc1) -1.41/15 151} Rb1+ {
(Th3) -2.21/11 79} 48. Ke2 {-1.32/11 2} Rh1 {-2.30/12 95} 49. Ne3 {
(Lb7) -0.99/12 39} Rh2+ {-2.30/10 46} 50. Kf1 {-0.91/14 54} Rxh5 {
(Tb2) -2.20/11 76} 51. Nxd5 {(Lb7) -0.30/13 72} Rxd5 {-4.26/12 75} 52. Bb7 {
-0.36/12 57} Bd8 {(Ld2) -4.26/11 47} 53. Rf3 {-0.32/12 42} Kd6 {
(Lg5) -4.37/12 73} 54. Rc3 {(Ta3) -0.31/12 39} Rf5+ {-4.42/11 49} 55. Kg2 {
(Ke2) -0.36/14 217} Nd4 {(Tg5+) -4.45/11 43} 56. Rc4 {(Le4) -0.35/12 59} Rg5+ {
-4.51/11 72} 57. Kf1 {(Kh3) -0.66/13 61} Bf6 {(Ke5) -4.55/11 67} 58. Ra4 {
-0.51/12 68} Rb5 {(Sb3) -4.63/11 67} 59. Ra6+ {(La6) -0.41/12 43} Ke5 {
(Sc6) -4.67/12 39} 60. Ba8 {(Lc6) -2.25/13 110} h5 {(Tb8) -4.73/10 52} 61. Ra4
{(Kg1) -2.25/12 34} h4 {(Tb8) -4.79/10 57} 62. Ra3 {-4.17/13 63} Rb2 {
(Kf4) -4.86/10 46} 63. Ra5+ {(Lg2) -4.95/13 41} Kf4 {-5.33/11 45} 64. Ra3 {
(Ta6) -5.59/13 56} Nf5 {(Le7) -6.14/10 46} 0-1
The game was posted in T.Czubs Forum.
It might look on first sight like a wrong bishop/h-pawn issue but this is
unforunately not the case.
Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.