Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results

Author: billiau

Date: 22:47:42 10/19/05

Hi,

I am agree about 99% of your post (hard work, errors, etc...).

About the 1% chance for a setting to be better, if they were so sure,
i can't understand why they let you test the Fruit setting.

Thurthermore, if the setting is only approximatly equal to the standard one in
long time control and it is better in analyzing mode (test suite...), i think it
could be better to officialize the setting.

G. Billiau

Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Heinz van Kempen 23:02:18 10/19/05
- Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results billiau 23:23:37 10/19/05
  - Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Thomas Logan 05:31:48 10/20/05
    - Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results billiau 10:10:26 10/20/05
  - Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Kurt Utzinger 00:22:44 10/20/05
    - Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results billiau 04:04:37 10/20/05
      - Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Kurt Utzinger 04:09:13 10/20/05
        
        Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Ray Banks 04:15:20 10/20/05
        
        Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Dr. Wael Deeb 05:28:32 10/20/05
        
        Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Ray Banks 08:50:34 10/20/05
        
        Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Thomas Logan 05:36:12 10/20/05
        
        Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Dr. Wael Deeb 08:11:52 10/20/05
        
        Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Thomas Logan 16:41:50 10/20/05
- Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Uri Blass 23:10:58 10/19/05
  - Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results Heinz van Kempen 23:25:29 10/19/05

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.