Author: Heinz van Kempen
Date: 23:02:18 10/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2005 at 01:47:42, billiau wrote: >Hi, > >I am agree about 99% of your post (hard work, errors, etc...). > >About the 1% chance for a setting to be better, if they were so sure, >i can't understand why they let you test the Fruit setting. > >Thurthermore, if the setting is only approximatly equal to the standard one in >long time control and it is better in analyzing mode (test suite...), i think it >could be better to officialize the setting. > >G. Billiau Hi, what you tell about analyzing mode is of course a point. The question is if Uri also tested positions where default setting found superb moves and the setting not. I asked this before. I think information is valuable for Fabien and Joachim anyway, they will draw also conclusions when the setting does not perform better. We have more games by now. Take a look at the list late eveing. Best Regards Heinz
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.