Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CEGT: testing and presentation of results

Author: Heinz van Kempen

Date: 23:25:29 10/19/05

Go up one level in this thread



>There are of course positions when the default setting is faster in finding
>moves but the feeling based on test suites is that the general result is better
>for selectivity=50
>
>I also remember that in one game that Fruit Uri lost Fruit default needed more
>time to avoid the losing mistake.
>
>In most games that I looked at them I did not detect the losing mistake so based
>on my memory so I tested only 2 positions from the CEGT games when in one of
>them I could not reproduce the error of Fruit Uri.
>
>Uri

When it proves to be true over at least 1000 tested positions that overall
chosen moves are better with a setting, than correspondence players would like
to know that they have the alternative to reduce history threshold to 50 or
other value to receive better analyses.

The Fruit team told me that they are espeially targetting this group of chess
enthusiasts and I played also correspondence chess for 25 years and would have
appreciated to know about such possibilities.

Best Regards
Heinz



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.