Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 05:21:14 10/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2005 at 08:05:18, Martin Andersen2 wrote: >On October 20, 2005 at 07:49:13, Thomas Logan wrote: > > >> >> 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789 >>1 Fruit 2.2 1101½½01½10½1½½½0½½1½01½1½0001½01110½½00½½1½010½½ 25.0/49 >>2 Shredder 9 0010½½10½01½0½½½1½½0½10½0½1110½10001½½11½½0½101½½ 24.0/49 >> >>some observations >> >>were it not for the first 2 games shredder would be in the lead by 1 game >> >If it wasn't for games 27 28 and 29, Fruit would have been ahead 25-21. >What is your point ? :-) I also noted were it not for the first 10 games Shredder would be leading by 2 Not so much a point as an observation In the first 10 games Fruit played with 2 books its own book.bin and ds8.ctg either fruit gained an advantage from this or shredder is being helped by learning or maybe its all a coincedent I dont know but it is an interresting match and should it go much longer I somewhat expect Shredder will take the lead though I will not be too surprised if it does not happen >>49 games may simply not be enough >That should be no surprise. How many games do you think would be necessary for position learning to be a factor ? > >Thanks for an interesting match. You are welcome Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.