Author: Günther Simon
Date: 05:54:18 10/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2005 at 19:14:43, chandler yergin wrote: >On October 19, 2005 at 02:06:48, Rick Hagen wrote: > >>On October 19, 2005 at 01:12:59, Will Singleton wrote: >> >>>[d]5rk1/6p1/P6p/3q4/1b6/2p1QNP1/2B2PKP/8 w - - >>> >>>The move is Be4. It's an interesting position due to the material imbalance, >>>together with the strength of the a pawn. Fruit finds a significant advantage >>>for white pretty quickly. Can your prog see a score of at least +0.50 here? >>>How about +1? White appears to be won. >> >> >>Analysis by Fritz 9: ... >>1.Be4 Qd6 2.a7 Bc5 3.Qe2 Bxa7 4.Qa2+ Rf7 5.Bd5 Qc7 6.Qb3 c2 7.Bxf7+ Qxf7 8.Qxc2 >>Qd5 9.Qg6 Bc5 >> ± (0.98) Depth: 17/44 00:06:07 452803kN >> >>(Hagen, Netherlands 19.10.2005) >> >> >>Of course, this analysis is incorrect because I use "engine mode" instead of >>"analysis mode".... (sigh) > >Thanks, you just proved there is not a Bug! >> >> >>Rick What has above position and Ricks irony towards you to do with the proven bugs in F9? Your message is again completely irrelevant and you are driving on a path towards insanity it seems? BTW it would be also helpful if you won't _full quote_ all messages you reply to(around 150 the last week). Some of them have not more of _your_ content, than one single line. Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.