Author: Daniel Shawul
Date: 09:08:14 10/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2005 at 11:59:56, Daniel Shawul wrote: >On October 20, 2005 at 11:46:34, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Here is the PGN for a blitz game Crafty played on ICC (ignore the pgn headers, I >>fabricated them when annotating the game, I believe the game was a 5 0 blitz). >> >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "?"] >>[Date "2005.10.18"] >>[Round "?"] >>[White "Crafty 20.1"] >>[WhiteElo ""] >>[Black "unknown"] >>[BlackElo ""] >>[Result "*"] >> >>1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Bb4 4. Bg5 c5 5. d5 h6 6. Bh4 Bxc3+ >>7. bxc3 d6 8. e3 e5 9. Bd3 e4 10. Bc2 Qe7 11. Bxf6 Qxf6 12. Ne2 >>Qe5 13. Qb1 Nd7 14. Bxe4 O-O 15. Bd3 Nf6 16. Qc2 a6 17. a4 Bg4 >>18. Rb1 b5 19. axb5 axb5 20. Rxb5 Bxe2 21. Kxe2 Rfe8 22. h3 >>Nh5 23. Kd2 Qg5 24. Rg1 Qf6 25. Rf1 Qe5 26. Rb7 Nf6 27. Rbb1 >>Qh2 28. Rg1 Nd7 29. Rbf1 Ne5 30. Ke2 Nxd3 31. Kxd3 Qe5 32. Kd2 >>Qf6 33. f4 Ra3 34. Re1 Qd8 35. Re2 Qa5 36. Rb1 Ra4 37. Kd3 f6 >>38. Rb5 Qa6 39. Qb3 Ra3 40. Qb2 Ra4 41. e4 Kh7 42. Qc2 Kg8 43. Qb3 >>Ra3 44. Qb2 Ra4 45. Qc2 Kh8 46. Qb3 Ra3 47. Qb2 Ra4 48. Qb3 >>Ra3 49. Qb2 Ra4 50. h4 h5 51. f5 Kh7 52. Qb1 Ra1 53. Rb6 Qa5 >>54. Qb3 Ra3 55. Rb5 Qa6 56. Qc2 Ra1 57. Rb1 Kh8 58. Ree1 Ra2 >>59. Qd1 Kg8 60. Qxh5 Ra8 61. Qg4 Ra4 62. e5 dxe5 63. Qe4 Ra3 >>64. Rb5 Qa4 65. d6 Ra2 66. Rc1 Rf2 67. Rxc5 Qa2 68. Qe1 Rd8 >>69. Ke3 Rxg2 70. Rd1 Rh2 71. Rd2 Rh3+ 72. Ke4 Qa8+ 73. Rdd5 >>Rxd6 74. Qb1 Rxd5 75. Rxd5 Qc8 76. Qb5 Rxh4+ 77. Ke3 Qxf5 78. Rd8+ >>Kh7 79. Qb3 Qf4+ 80. Kd3 Rh2 81. Rh8+ Kxh8 82. Qd1 e4+ 83. Kd4 >>Qd6+ 84. Ke3 Qxd1 85. Kxe4 Rf2 86. c5 * >> >> >>The interesting stuff starts around move 65. White played d6 with an eval of >>+3.20. Let your program search there to see what it likes. The longer you >>search, the more the score should drop. >> >>If it doesn't follow the game another move and try again. Crafty's scores >>looked like this: >> >>move 66: +3.15, 67: +2.41, 68: +1.59, 69: +.62, 70: 0.00, 71: -.39, 72: 0.00, >>73: 0.00, 74: -1.33, 75: -2.76, 76: -2.75, 77: -12.0, 78: -13.66, etc. >> >>I first thought I had some sort of bug, but after playing back through the >>position, this is less a bug and more just missing deep tactics. Would be >>interesting to see what kinds of scores at different depths other programs see >>starting at move 66... > >scorpio didnt like moves of crafty at 66,67 >but it plays move 68 Qe1 with a negative score (where crafty says 1.59) >FEN: r5k1/6p1/3P1p2/2R1pP2/2P1Q2P/2PK4/q4rP1/2R5 w - - 1 68 > >Scorpio 1.6: > 1 00:00 106 106 -M1 Rc5xe5 Qa2-d2 > 1 00:00 113 113 -3.23 Qe4xa8 Qa2xa8 d6-d7 Kg8-h7 Rc5-c8 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 >Qa8-a7 Rc8-c5 > 1 00:00 285 285 +0.22 Qe4-d5 Kg8-h8 Kd3-e3 Rf2xg2 Rc1-c2 Rg2xc2 >d6-d7 Rc2xc3 Ke3-e4 Rc3xc4 Rc5xc4 > 1 00:00 299 299 +0.45 Qe4-e3 Rf2xg2 d6-d7 Ra8-f8 > 2 00:00 415 415 +0.45 Qe4-e3 Rf2xg2 d6-d7 Ra8-f8 > 3 00:00 1.399 1.399 -2.18 Qe4-e3 Ra8-d8 Rc5-c6 Rf2xg2 Kd3-e4 > 3 00:00 3.277 327.700 +0.11 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-c6 Rf2xg2 Kd3-e4 > 4 00:00 5.475 547.500 +0.11 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-c6 > 5 00:00 14.991 374.775 -0.39 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-c6 Rf2xg2 Qe1-e3 > 5 00:00 34.342 381.577 -0.76 Qe4-e1 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 Rf2xg2 Rc1-d1 Rg2-g4 > 6 00:00 56.454 403.242 -0.25 Qe4-e1 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 Rf2xg2 Rc1-d1 Rg2-g4 > 6 00:00 63.004 420.026 +0.18 Qe4-e1 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 Rf2xg2 Rc1-d1 Qa2-c2 >Ke3-d4 > 7 00:00 122.283 489.132 +0.13 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-d5 Rf2xg2 Qe1-e3 > 8 00:00 235.564 547.823 +0.04 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-c6 Rf2xg2 Qe1-e3 Rg2-g4 > 9 00:01 431.990 568.407 -0.46 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-c6 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 Kg8-h8 > 9 00:02 1.047.873 578.935 -0.68 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 Qa2xa5 >Ke3xf2 Qa5xf5 Kf2-g1 Rd8xd6 > 10 00:04 2.173.739 607.189 -0.18 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 e5-e4 Kd3-e3 Qa2xa5 >Ke3xf2 Qa5xf5 Kf2-g1 Rd8xd6 Qe1-f2 > 10 00:04 2.357.576 554.723 -0.47 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e3 Qa2xa5 >Ke3xf2 Qa5-c5 Kf2-g3 Qc5xc4 Qe1-e3 Kg8-f7 > 11 00:08 4.958.961 583.407 -0.57 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e3 Qa2xa5 >Ke3xf2 Qa5-c5 Kf2-f1 Qc5xc4 Kf1-g1 Qc4-f4 Rc1-b1 Qf4xf5 Rb1-b8 Kg8-f7 > 12 00:16 10.123.042 613.517 -0.57 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e3 Qa2xa5 >Ke3xf2 Qa5-c5 Kf2-f1 Qc5xc4 Kf1-g1 Qc4-f4 Rc1-b1 Qf4xf5 Rb1-b8 Kg8-f7 [D]r5k1/6p1/3P1p2/2R1pP2/2P1Q2P/2PK4/q4rP1/2R5 w - - score goes down further after 5 minutes of analysis 13 00:31 19.086.240 604.760 -0.48 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e3 Qa2xa5 Ke3xf2 Qa5-c5 Kf2-f1 Qc5xc4 Kf1-g1 Qc4-f4 Rc1-b1 Rd6-d2 Rb1-b7 14 01:05 40.379.321 621.220 -0.48 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Qa2xa5 Qe1xf2 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e2 Qa5-a2 Ke2-e1 Qa2xc4 h4-h5 Rd6-d3 g2-g3 Qc4-e4 Ke1-f1 Qe4-h1 Kf1-e2 15 02:37 99.187.575 631.767 -0.46 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Qa2xa5 Qe1xf2 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e2 Qa5-a2 Ke2-f1 Rd6-d2 Qf2-g3 Qa2xc4 Kf1-g1 Qc4-e4 Rc1-a1 Qe4xf5 Ra1-a8 Kg8-h7 16 05:09 192.455.258 622.832 -0.96 Qe4-e1 Ra8-d8 Rc5-a5 Qa2xa5 Qe1xf2 Rd8xd6 Kd3-e2 Qa5-a2 Ke2-f1 Rd6-d2 Qf2-f3 Qa2xc4 Kf1-e1 Rd2-d3 Qf3-f2 Rd3-d6 g2-g3
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.