Author: Tony Werten
Date: 11:09:20 10/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2005 at 12:34:49, John Merlino wrote:
>On October 20, 2005 at 03:52:29, ERIQ wrote:
>
>>[Event "ICC 5 0"]
>>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>>[Date "2005.10.19"]
>>[Round "-"]
>>[White "z0"]
>>[Black "eriq"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[WhiteElo "1889"]
>>[BlackElo "1852"]
>>[ECO "B90"]
>>[ICCResult "White checkmated"]
>>[Opening "Sicilian: Najdorf, Adams attack"]
>>[NIC "SI.14"]
>>[Time "22:58:43"]
>>[TimeControl "300+0"]
>>
>>1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 a6 5.Nc3 Nf6 6.h3 e5 7.Nde2 Be6 8.g4
>>Nbd7 9.Bg2 h6 10.O-O g5 11.Ng3 Be7 12.Be3 Nf8 13.Nf5 Ng6 14.Ng7+ Kf8 15.
>>Nf5 Nf4 16.Bxf4 gxf4 17.Bf3 Qd7 18.Qd2 h5 19.g5 Rg8 20.h4 Bxf5 21.exf5
>>Qxf5 22.Kh2 Ng4+ 23.Kh1 Bxg5!
>> {one of my better moments, but fruit 2.1 never considered it and in
>> fact only finds f6! a strong but safe move}
>> ( {16:+1.12} 23...f6 24.Bd5 Rg7 25.Bxb7 Rb8 26.Bxa6 Nh6 27.f3 fxg5 28.
>> Bb5 gxh4 29.a4 Rg3 30.Nd5 Qh3+ 31.Qh2 Rxf3 32.Qxh3 Rxh3+ 33.Kg2 )
>>24.hxg5 Qxg5 25.Qxd6+ Kg7 26.Bxg4 Qh4+ 27.Kg2 Qxg4+ 28.Kh2 Qh4+ 29.Kg2
>>Kh7+ 30.Kf3 e4+ 31.Kxe4 Rge8+ 32.Kf3
>> ( 32.Kd3 -+ {fruit and I play this out. I was wondering why 32.kd3 was
>> so good but white is just loss anyway.} 32...Rad8 33.Qd5 Qg5 34.Kc4
>> b5+ 35.Kb3 Rxd5 36.a4 Rc5 37.Rfd1 Qe5 38.Rd3 Rec8 39.Rad1 b4 40.Kxb4
>> Qb8+ 41.Ka3 Rxc3+ 42.Rxc3 Rxc3+ 43.bxc3 h4 44.c4 h3 45.Rh1 Qf8+ 46.Ka2
>> Qh6 47.c5 Kg7 48.Rh2 Kf8 49.Ka3 Ke7 50.c6 Kd6 51.c4 Kxc6 52.Kb3 Kc5
>> 53.Kc3 a5 54.Kb3 Qe6 55.f3 Qxc4+ 56.Kb2 Qe6 57.Ka3 Qe3+ 58.Kb2 Qxf3
>> 59.Rd2 Qg2 60.Kc3 Qxd2+ 61.Kxd2 h2 62.Ke2 h1=Q 63.Kd3 Kd5 64.Ke2 Ke4
>> 65.Kd2 f3 66.Kc2 Ke3 67.Kb3 Qc1 68.Ka2 f2 69.Kb3 f1=Q 70.Ka2 Qfc4# )
>>32...Qg4#
>> {White checkmated}
>>0-1
>
>CM9_R1 on a P4-2.4 finds a different move with a good score -- Nf6!
>
>Time Depth Score Positions Moves
>0:00 1/3 0.33 3893 1...Qd7 2.Qd5 Rb8 3.Qd3
>0:00 1/4 0.08 7851 1...Qd7 2.Qd5 Rb8 3.Bg2 b5
>0:00 1/5 0.00 33041 1...Qd7 2.Rad1 Nf6 3.Kh2 Ng4+ 4.Kh1
>0:00 1/6 0.00 94201 1...Qd7 2.Qd3 Nf6 3.Kh2 Ng4+ 4.Kg1
> Nf6 5.Kh2
>0:01 1/7 0.31 245060 1...Qd7 2.Qd3 Rc8 3.Bd5 Bd8 4.Rae1
> Ba5
>0:02 1/7 -0.29 294781 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.gxf6 Qxf6 4.Bg2
> Qxh4+ 5.Bh3 e3
>0:02 1/8 -0.23 414736 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.gxf6 Qxf6 4.Bg2
> Qxh4+ 5.Bh3 e3 6.Qd3
>0:06 1/9 -1.00 1195666 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.Bg2 f3 4.Bh3
> Qe5+ 5.Kh1 Ng4 6.Bxg4 hxg4
>0:10 1/10 -1.01 1993073 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.Bg2 f3 4.Bh3
> Qe5+ 5.Kh1 Ng4 6.Bxg4 hxg4 7.Qd5
> Rh8 8.Qxe5 dxe5
>0:24 1/11 -1.86 4884818 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.Bg2 Ng4+ 4.Kg1
> Ne5 5.f3 Nxf3+ 6.Bxf3 exf3 7.Kh2
> Qg4 8.Qf2 Rc8
>0:48 1/12 -2.00 9979995 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.Bg2 f3 4.Bh3
> Qe5+ 5.Kh1 d5 6.Rg1 Bd6 7.Rg3 e3
> 8.Qd3 exf2
>2:07 1/13 -2.07 26732115 1...Nf6 2.Kh2 e4 3.Bg2 f3 4.Bh3
> Qe5+ 5.Kh1 d5 6.Rg1 Bd6 7.Rg3 e3
> 8.Qe1 d4
>
>jm
XiniX agrees after 9 secs, but only with a +1 score
Tony
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.