Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fun Rating List.........New No 1

Author: Bertil Eklund

Date: 14:38:52 10/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 19, 2005 at 17:50:00, Chessfun wrote:

>On October 19, 2005 at 16:37:34, Bertil Eklund wrote:
>
>>On October 19, 2005 at 16:18:50, Albert Silver wrote:
>>
>>>On October 19, 2005 at 15:10:33, Chessfun wrote:
>>>
>>>>On October 19, 2005 at 01:29:41, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Sarah
>>>>>Thanks for your update. Am I right that
>>>>>you don't own Fruit 2.2?
>>>>>Regards
>>>>>Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
>>>>
>>>>Correct mostly due to not yet having my AMD X2 4400. I also don't like the whole
>>>>process of installation per PC. I would have no problem were a version available
>>>>that didn't require such a complicated scheme.
>>>>
>>>>Sarah.
>>>
>>>I found the process pretty simple. Download the file, send the code by e-mail,
>>>get the second code by e-mail, and presto it's done. It sure beats having to
>>>insert a CD every X days. Once done, it also won't ask for the CD for every
>>>program you want to use the engine in on that machine, contrary to other
>>>commercial UCI engines.
>>>
>>What happens if you change the speed of the computer? In example one of my A1200
>>I often overclocks to 1400 or 1466mhz.
>>
>>Bertil
>
>I guess we both should have joined the CEGT then we wouldn't need to ask this
>question ;-)
>
>Sarah.

Hi, Sarah!

Of course I should have ordered Fruit2.2 if I only had the possibility to pay
over the Internet. Stoneage comes to mind.....

I´m a little bit worried about you when you already complains about the hard
work it is to reinstall and configurate all programs when you buy a new
computer. When I was at your age I took it as a challenge but nowadays I only
want to set a few parameters and play the games. It wasn´t easier in the old
days when you used a different DOS setup for the programs.

As always I look forward for your testing and especially of Fruit, I am sure
that the installation problem is easely solved (from both sides).

I really hope that your list could be a new "standard" for computer playing
strength in the future. Hopefully not only for freaks like us that frequents
this forum.

Bertil





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.