Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Shredder learning must be better than Fruit 2.2.....................

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 17:37:45 10/20/05

Go up one level in this thread


On October 20, 2005 at 19:34:51, Thomas Logan wrote:

Shredder learning must be better than Fruit 2.2, and after 75 games Shredder
should be ahead  :-)


>Yes after 50 games of which Shredder trailed from the beginning the
>
>score is now even
>
>Shredder down as much as 4 games at one point playing the black side of a
>Najdorf poison pawn scored the point to tie the match
>
>[Event "THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 120'/40+60'/20+30'"]
>[Site "THOMAS-KBZT8WLT"]
>[Date "2005.10.20"]
>[Round "1"]
>[White "Fruit 2.2"]
>[Black "Shredder 9"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "B97"]
>[Annotator "-0.05;-0.31"]
>[PlyCount "126"]
>[TimeControl "40/7200:20/3600:1800"]
>
>{W=19.2 ply; 1,091kN/s  B=20.4 ply; 634kN/s; 325,517 TBAs} 1. e4 {
>White last book move 0.01/1 0} c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0.01/1 0} d6 {0} 3. d4 {0.01/1 0}
>cxd4 {0} 4. Nxd4 {0.01/1 0} Nf6 {0} 5. Nc3 {0.01/1 0} a6 {0} 6. Bg5 {0.01/1 0}
>e6 {0} 7. f4 {0.01/1 0} Qb6 {0} 8. Qd2 {0.01/1 0} Qxb2 {0} 9. Rb1 {0.01/1 0}
>Qa3 {0} 10. f5 {0.01/1 0} Nc6 {0} 11. fxe6 {0.01/1 0} fxe6 {0} 12. Nxc6 {
>0.01/1 0} bxc6 {0} 13. Be2 {0.01/1 0} Be7 {0} 14. O-O {0.01/1 0} O-O {0} 15.
>Rb3 {0.01/1 0} Qc5+ {0} 16. Be3 {0.01/1 0} Qe5 {0} 17. Bf4 {0.01/1 0} Qc5+ {0}
>18. Kh1 {0.01/1 0} Ng4 {Black last book move 0} 19. Bxg4 {-0.05/17 218} e5 {
>-0.31/20 551} 20. Bxc8 {(Be2) -0.05/18 352} Raxc8 {-0.76/19 145} 21. g3 {
>(Ne2) 0.00/18 316} exf4 {-0.76/20 472} 22. gxf4 {0.00/17 379} Bf6 {
>(Rce8) -0.63/19 432} 23. Qd3 {-0.08/17 231} Rce8 {-0.61/18 380} 24. Nb1 {
>(Ne2) 0.00/18 835} a5 {(Qd4) -0.58/18 453} 25. Nd2 {0.00/18 182} Re7 {
>(Rb8) -0.33/18 558} 26. Rfb1 {0.12/17 285} g6 {-0.25/18 374} 27. Nf3 {
>(Rb8) 0.00/17 396} a4 {(Ref7) -0.28/18 309} 28. Rb8 {0.00/18 295} Ref7 {
>-0.33/18 235} 29. Rxf8+ {(f5) 0.00/17 191} Rxf8 {-0.27/19 294} 30. Rd1 {
>(Rb7) 0.00/18 333} Qb4 {(Qh5) -0.33/18 279} 31. Rf1 {0.00/18 339} Qc3 {
>(Qc5) -0.35/19 604} 32. Qxd6 {(Kg2) 0.00/18 181} Qxc2 {(Qc4) -0.53/20 312} 33.
>e5 {-0.15/18 384} Bg7 {-0.61/19 319} 34. Qe6+ {-0.16/18 448} Kh8 {-0.98/17 41}
>35. Ng5 {-0.37/18 243} h6 {-0.98/19 360} 36. Nf7+ {-0.41/18 391} Kh7 {
>-1.22/19 155} 37. Rf3 {-0.41/18 342} Qe2 {(Qe4) -0.98/18 439} 38. Rg3 {
>-0.87/18 253} Qf1+ {-0.98/17 104} 39. Rg1 {-0.04/4 0} Qf3+ {-0.98/17 179} 40.
>Rg2 {-0.04/4 0} Qd3 {(Qd1+) -1.35/17 73} 41. h3 {(Rg3) -0.51/17 156} c5 {
>(Qe4) -1.81/18 274} 42. Kg1 {-1.00/17 201} c4 {-2.59/18 236} 43. f5 {
>-0.94/17 137} Qb1+ {-2.28/17 215} 44. Kf2 {-1.06/19 249} Qxf5+ {-2.28/18 159}
>45. Qxf5 {-1.19/23 185} gxf5 {-2.32/20 11} 46. e6 {-1.37/23 176} Re8 {
>-2.13/22 173} 47. Nd6 {-1.48/23 248} Rxe6 {-2.18/23 176} 48. Nxf5 {-1.55/23 244
>} Bf6 {-2.14/22 180} 49. Kf3 {-1.55/22 193} c3 {-2.37/22 172} 50. Rc2 {
>-1.62/21 269} Rb6 {-2.36/23 172} 51. Ne3 {-1.75/22 252} Rb2 {-2.45/22 133} 52.
>Ke4 {-1.62/22 240} Rb4+ {-2.45/21 123} 53. Kd5 {(Kf5) -1.74/22 236} Rh4 {
>-2.45/21 209} 54. Rh2 {-1.77/21 173} Kg6 {(Rd4+) -2.47/20 154} 55. Ng4 {
>(Nc2) -1.65/18 201} Bh8 {(Bg7) -2.76/20 147} 56. Ne3 {-1.88/19 172} Kg5 {
>(Rd4+) -2.92/20 139} 57. Nc2 {-2.01/20 415} Rf4 {-2.94/21 236} 58. Rh1 {
>(Kc5) -2.03/19 191} Kh4 {(Bf6) -3.41/20 190} 59. a3 {(Kc6) -2.08/19 152} Bf6 {
>-3.34/20 126} 60. Re1 {-2.10/19 109} h5 {(Rf3) -3.38/20 184} 61. Re3 {
>-2.42/18 81} Rf2 {-3.41/20 57} 62. Ke6 {(Ne1) -2.94/18 42} Rxc2 {
>(Kg5) -4.32/21 55} 63. Kxf6 {-3.29/21 19} Rc1 {adjud. -5.18/21 31} 0-1
>
>THOMAS-KBZT8WLT, 120'/40+60'/20+30'  0
>
>                12345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
>1   Fruit 2.2   1101½½01½10½1½½½0½½1½01½1½0001½01110½½00½½1½010½½0 25.0/50
>625.00
>2   Shredder 9  0010½½10½01½0½½½1½½0½10½0½1110½10001½½11½½0½101½½1 25.0/50
>625.00
>
>Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.