Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 18:16:11 10/20/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2005 at 20:37:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 20, 2005 at 19:34:51, Thomas Logan wrote: > >Shredder learning must be better than Fruit 2.2, and after 75 games Shredder >should be ahead :-) Yes that is a possibility though I am not sure and tend to doubt it but How would you check it ? Other than running another match of equal duration Fruit appears to have been helped by the addition of df8.ctg to book.bin and was + 3 after the first 10 games thereafter fruit played with own book alone What I have done is put all the fruit-shredder games into chessbase clipbase and organized by eco codes I then look for duplicate openings to see if perhaps shredder was helped by a previous game position There was no apparent evidence that Shredder benefitted from this Perhaps this is the wrong way to test - I am unsure as to how position learning works and maybe it works negatively in the avoidance of a position I don't know you tell me Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.