Author: Thomas Logan
Date: 04:34:45 10/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2005 at 03:59:30, Marc Lacrosse wrote: >On October 20, 2005 at 22:34:23, Thomas Logan wrote: > >>On October 20, 2005 at 22:24:02, Russell wrote: >> >>>I think ur right Position learning might have little influence nevertheless, >>>with more games it will eventually be a factor. Yes, Fruit was sort of >>>"optimized" using strong opening books in the early stage. Just the Fruit's reg >>>opening book always seemed quite strong to me anyways. only way to check is to >>>first use both books for Fruit once again and see what happens. But the score >>>will obviously be not part of the scorecard. >>> >>>Russell >> >>I agree fruits book is quite satifactory >> >>I was orginally concerned that it would severely limit >> >>the variety of play but it has not >> >>Tom > >Thanks for your kind comments on fruit's books quality ! >If you wish broadened variety of opening play, the second book in the package >has it without too much performance drop. > >Marc Thanks Marc I have not found it necessary Out of the 50 games played there were but 7 repeat openings classifications not positions mind you but eco codes The book works quite well for fruit Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.