Author: Terry McCracken
Date: 18:24:16 10/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2005 at 20:58:50, Peter Berger wrote: >On October 21, 2005 at 20:47:29, Terry McCracken wrote: > >>Peter you're so naive. > >I doubt that this is the case. Really? > > >>If he believes he's correct than Chan is a simpleton. > >Another abuse ( none of *these* were moderated btw). No, a fact. > >>He has been informed by the best, and all he can do is rant and call the best >>misinformed idiots. > >He hasn't done that in the current discussions. But yes, for some reason he >doesn't believe in the arguments provided by the best, even if they know much >more about computerchess than him. I didn't really understand his line of >reasoning either. Even worse, he tried to argue against their arguments. Would >this be a crime now ? Ah..did you read his arguements carefully? I don't think you have? > >I believe all kind of strange things too. I believe that the Shredder tournament >book is worse than a good PGN book and that there is strong evidence that Zappa >is the strongest chessprogram around. I also believe that a result of 6-0 in a >match between two computer programs without learning is enough to conclude that >the winner is better than the loser , and many more even stranger things . Will >I be the next :) ? > >Peter If you shoved it down my throat and said I'm out of it, YES! Here's something Chan sent me, you figure it out. In a message dated 10/21/2005 11:23:25 A.M. US Mountain Standard Tim, nomad@easyfocus.com writes: So why are you doing this to yourself? We are in a unique situation where we have MODS with great Scientific background. It is certainly not their 'obligation' to share that experience. But.. it would be nice if they would, and to help teach & educate here, as Posters not as Mods. Many here are in the dark about how the Programs and the engines they use work. This includes some Programmers.. like Uri, who really hasn't a clue. I've had to drag him kicking & screaming into the world of reality! He didn't know that the Program evaluates every legal move in eveery position on the board! Every position on the board Is a Root Position. Bruce didn't know that EGTB's truly present perfect play from all 5 man positions. This is "DUMBSHIT" Do you just want to piss everyone off, get revenge for previous suspensions? NO, I was banned for telling the Truth on both Forums. ICC is hostile to Players, and those who bust bubbles, and their Urban Myths. Computers malfunction btw, it's people who are dysfunctional. No, Computers do two things. 1. They Store and retrieve information (no more ..no less) 2. They "Evaluate" based on feedback from the Min-Max Algorithm No more.. no less... They have NO intelligence! Do you really think Hyatt is going to stake his reputation by denying how Chess Computer Programs work? I think not.. Oh.. he may vote to ban me.. he has threatened that already. Do I give a Rat's Patootie? I will Post truth. for I have Integrity, and that's what's important in life. At least mine... you can go with the flow and the "DUMBASSES" here I won't! =============================================================================== This was sent to me shortly before the suspension was in effect. It went downhill from here. Terry
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.