Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:05:49 10/21/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2005 at 00:40:54, Peter Skinner wrote: >Hi Uri, > >So this is how you would have it: > >1 Fruit >2 ban (Junior) >3 Hiarcs8x >4 SpikeX >5 Crafty >6 WildCatXX >7 Amyan >8 Amateur >9 PosrModernist >10 ArasanX >11 QuarkX >12 Chessthinker >13 Tinker >14 Thono >15 notalent >16 Telepath > >My only problem is that I think GNUChess on a P4 1.4 Ghz machine will crush the >hardware that Thinker will be using. I will be surprised if it happens. The hardware advantage of gnu is probably not more than 10:1 I believe that thinker is more than 400 elo better than gnuchess and 10:1 hardware advantage is enough maybe for 230 elo in blitz based on AEGT rating list I have Thinker 4.6c 2547 CyberPagno 2.1 2165 Note that CyberPagno is probably slightly better than gnuchess. some rating from Leo's list 92 CyberPagno 2.1 2206 97 GNUChess 4TM 2147 Note also that Thinker4.6c is weaker than thinker of today. The rating that I give are only for long time control and not for blitz but I do not believe that the picture at blitz is significantly different. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.