Author: Tom King
Date: 14:23:24 03/13/99
Go up one level in this thread
On March 13, 1999 at 07:48:31, Tom King wrote: >On March 12, 1999 at 02:45:52, Peter McKenzie wrote: > >>On March 12, 1999 at 02:26:49, JW de Kort wrote: >> [SNIP] >>>e.g suposse we have the following possible captures: PxN, PxR, QxR >>> >>>using methode 1: PxR, PxN, QxR >>>using methode 2: PxR, QxR, PxN >>> >>>Wich one is MVA/LVA? >> >>It is method 2. >>As a finesse, you can try sorting King captures first (so KxR comes before PxR). > >Is this good (King captures first)? Doesn't this go against the definition of >MVVLVA? > I just ran some quick tests. For my program following MVVLVA rather than MVVLVA (but sorting these king captures first) seems to be about 5% faster. Anyone else tried this?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.