Author: gerold daniels
Date: 16:11:19 10/22/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2005 at 18:53:03, Peter Skinner wrote: >On October 22, 2005 at 16:40:31, Uri Blass wrote: > >>Which program is tsukasa? > >Amyan > >>Note that I am surprised by the good results of gnuchess. > >If you look back on the history of GNUChess in the CCT's, it has done well. And >due to that, it is the #1 choice as a "filler" when there are uneven >participants. > >It is never just a "gimme" game on today's hardware. > >>Even if I look at the elo it has better performance than Amateur. >> >>Amateur had better hardware based on my knowledge and I thought that Amateur is >>significantly better than gnuchess even on equal hardware. >> >>Uri > >Here is an interesting fact: > >Junior, Fruit, Crafty, Spike, PostModernist, and Hiarcs all _played_ one more >game than some of the others due to a bye created by QuarkX, yet finised in the >top 4. (If you count tying for places) > > Name Score #g > 1 Fruit (3008) 7.5 9 > 1 ban (2689) 7.5 9 > 2 SpikeX (2714) 6.5 9 > 3 Hiarcs8x (2812) 5.5 9 > 3 crafty (2604) 5.5 9 > 3 notalent (2424) 5.5 8 > 4 ArasanX (2557) 5.0 8 > 4 PostModernist (2569) 5.0 9 > >Peter Very good Peter. Thanks for the interesting match. Good to see crafty up there. Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.