Author: stuart taylor
Date: 12:43:21 10/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2005 at 12:07:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On October 23, 2005 at 11:23:00, stuart taylor wrote: > >>In matches between the two engines, Junior 9 did atleast as good as Fruit 2.2 >>against Shredder 9. >>I always believe we need to compare relative things, in order to see a better >>picture of different programs' strengths and weaknesses. Fruit is slightly >>better vs other programs too, which junior is slightly less with. >>S.Taylor > > Where does Junior9 better than Fruti 2.2 > - results > - time control > Thanks for more details ... > Regards > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] I have not the time to search it out now, nor the details in front of me. So I do not insist on it if you say I'm wrong. I also appologise if I was wrong. But, from memmory, I was sure that Junior 9 often came out slightly above Shredder 9 in several "matches", between those two engines (playing EACH OTHER) alone/explicitly. Not in general. I was always looking at the longer time controls, not blitz. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.