Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 12:53:36 10/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2005 at 15:43:21, stuart taylor wrote:
>On October 23, 2005 at 12:07:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On October 23, 2005 at 11:23:00, stuart taylor wrote:
>>
>>>In matches between the two engines, Junior 9 did atleast as good as Fruit 2.2
>>>against Shredder 9.
>>>I always believe we need to compare relative things, in order to see a better
>>>picture of different programs' strengths and weaknesses. Fruit is slightly
>>>better vs other programs too, which junior is slightly less with.
>>>S.Taylor
>>
>> Where does Junior9 better than Fruti 2.2
>> - results
>> - time control
>> Thanks for more details ...
>> Regards
>> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
>
>I have not the time to search it out now, nor the details in front of me. So I
>do not insist on it if you say I'm wrong. I also appologise if I was wrong.
>But, from memmory, I was sure that Junior 9 often came out slightly above
>Shredder 9 in several "matches", between those two engines (playing EACH OTHER)
>alone/explicitly. Not in general.
>I was always looking at the longer time controls, not blitz.
>S.Taylor
Hi Stuart
You are surely not wrong in so far as Junior 9 is a
tough opponent for Shredder 9 at longer time control.
See also [http://www.utzingerk.com/shredder9_test.htm]
But Shredder 9 has almost ever the better results than
Junior 9 vs other engines.
Regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.