Author: David Dahlem
Date: 15:55:01 10/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2005 at 16:50:35, F. Huber wrote: >On October 24, 2005 at 16:21:17, David Dahlem wrote: > >>>The simple reason is: Fruit 2.2 is a clone of Chest! :-))) >>> >>>Regards, >>>Franz. >> >>Hi Franz >> >>No way, Fruit can't be a clone of Chest, since the pv is different. :-)) >> >>ChestUCI Ver.4.2: >> >>1.b8N+ Rxb8 2.axb8N+ Kd6 3.c8N+ Ke6 4.d8N+ Bxd8 5.exd8N+ Kf6 6.g8N+ Qxg8 >>7.hxg8N+ Rxg8 8.fxg8N# >> >>Fruit 2.2: >> >>1.b8N+ Rxb8 2.axb8N+ Kd6 3.c8N+ Ke6 4.d8N+ Bxd8 5.exd8N+ Kf6 6.g8N+ Qxg8 >>7.fxg8N+ Rxg8 8.hxg8N+ >> >>Regards >>Dave > >No no, this little difference in the last few moves is Fruits method to hide >its true origin! :-) > >The only way for Fabien to prove that I´m wrong would be to publish the source >of Fruit 2.2 ..... (a good trick of mine, isn´t it? ;-)) > >Franz. Hi Franz At first glance, it does seem to be a good trick of yours, but at second glance, i'm not so sure. To prove Fruit 2.2 source is the same as the Chest source, the source of Chest will have to be published. :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.