Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 03:56:51 10/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2005 at 18:55:01, David Dahlem wrote: >On October 24, 2005 at 16:50:35, F. Huber wrote: > >>On October 24, 2005 at 16:21:17, David Dahlem wrote: >> >>>>The simple reason is: Fruit 2.2 is a clone of Chest! :-))) >>>> >>>>Regards, >>>>Franz. >>> >>>Hi Franz >>> >>>No way, Fruit can't be a clone of Chest, since the pv is different. :-)) >>> >>>ChestUCI Ver.4.2: >>> >>>1.b8N+ Rxb8 2.axb8N+ Kd6 3.c8N+ Ke6 4.d8N+ Bxd8 5.exd8N+ Kf6 6.g8N+ Qxg8 >>>7.hxg8N+ Rxg8 8.fxg8N# >>> >>>Fruit 2.2: >>> >>>1.b8N+ Rxb8 2.axb8N+ Kd6 3.c8N+ Ke6 4.d8N+ Bxd8 5.exd8N+ Kf6 6.g8N+ Qxg8 >>>7.fxg8N+ Rxg8 8.hxg8N+ >>> >>>Regards >>>Dave >> >>No no, this little difference in the last few moves is Fruits method to hide >>its true origin! :-) >> >>The only way for Fabien to prove that I´m wrong would be to publish the source >>of Fruit 2.2 ..... (a good trick of mine, isn´t it? ;-)) >> >>Franz. > >Hi Franz > >At first glance, it does seem to be a good trick of yours, but at second glance, >i'm not so sure. To prove Fruit 2.2 source is the same as the Chest source, the >source of Chest will have to be published. :-) http://www.drb.insel.de/~heiner/Chess/chest.html >Regards >Dave Cheers, Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.