Author: Chessfun
Date: 20:05:06 10/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2005 at 04:44:17, Chris Taylor wrote: >On October 24, 2005 at 21:21:04, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 24, 2005 at 20:25:50, James T. Walker wrote: >> >>>Can anyone tell me how fast the Athlon 64x2 4200 is compared to the single >>>processor Athlon 64s? I mean are they "4200" because the dual core is expected >>>to be faster than a single core or are they "real" 4200 machines with two cores? >>> In other words is the dual core 4200 significantly faster than say a Athlon 64 >>>3700 running a "single" program like Hiarcs or ProDeo? >>>Thanks for any info >>>Jim >> >>Since I just got this one: >>http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/genericDocument?lc=en&cc=us&docname=c00511049#top >> >>The dual 4200 runs each part of the dual core at 2.2 ghz so each part of the >>dual is approx equal to the 64 3500+ 2.2 Ghz 512 kb level 2 cache. >> >>Sarah. > >Sarah > >If you get the time would you post some benchies please. It might prompt me >into getting one! Sad as it my sound will you do Crafty 19.19 from Chessbase, I >really like this engine! > >I have Windows 64 bit on one 3200, and have Crafty from BHs' site, so I have >seen how fast the speedup is on one chip. > >Best >Chris CB Engine Crafty 19.19 running in Hiarcs 9 from start position: 2 CPU's = 2162 Kns after 2 mins 64 MB 1 CPU = 1100 Kns after 2 mins 64 MB My XP 2600+ = 820 Kns after 2 mins 64 MB Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.