Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:59:13 10/25/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2005 at 02:31:37, Ray Banks wrote:
>On October 26, 2005 at 01:25:35, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>> Hi Ray
>> Many thanks for testing. Glad to see that a CM10k
>> setting got the first time an overall score above 50 %
>> vs others engines ... although it did not happen vs
>> Shredder 9, Fritz 8 Bilbao and Fruit 2.1 and for this
>> reason I am still not too happy. The best CM9k settings
>> had at the time no such problems :-) and belonged to
>> the absolute top. It seems as if CM10k can't match
>> with this behaviour.
>> Regards
>> Kurt
>
>On the contrary - CM9000 Slayer is in that table, and is near the bottom. The
>best CM10th settings are far better than any CM9000 setting
Hi Ray
I have perhaps expressed myself not clear enough. I wanted
to say that at the good old time of CM9k with previous
versions of top programs Fritz, Shredder, Hiarcs and so on,
the best CM9k setting belonged to the absolute top which
nowadays is no longer the case with CM10k. There is however
no doubt that the best CM10k settings are stronger than any
CM9k setting.
Regards
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.