Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 09:12:39 10/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2005 at 10:39:51, Svein Bjørnar Myrvang wrote: >On October 26, 2005 at 10:21:07, Svein Bjørnar Myrvang wrote: > >>I suspect Fritz is very adaptive in the amount and type of knowledge it applies >>to a given position. (I think Franz Morsch hinted about it in an interview a >>while before the release of Fritz 9, but I don't remember where I read it.) In a >>position without pieces and no captures avalible, it's very unlikely to be any >>hidden deep tactics that run counter to positional knowledge. Therefore, Fritz >>uses all its knowledge about pawns (structure, space, etc.) and kings (activity, >>safety, etc.) and this slows down the search. With all the pieces on the board, >>there's more material to account for, true, but the position also has more scope >>for tactics, and so search becomes relatively more important. Pro Deo also has >>plenty of knowledge, but uses it less flexibly, in that all knowledge that >>applies to a position is always used, except when using lazy eval, and so with >>fewer types of material on the board, less knowledge is used. This is just a >>guess, of course, I'm probably way off... :) > >Found the interview! Its at http://www.chesscafe.com/text/mig26.pdf That is the concession speach. It has been rehashed here pretty much in a previous thread.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.