Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:22:31 10/26/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2005 at 11:30:44, Sedat wrote: >On October 26, 2005 at 11:09:20, Peter Kasinski wrote: > >>- Match of 24 games >>- Fruit 2.2: FX-55 2.6 GHz; 512 Mb hash >>- Deep Junior 9: Athlon 64 X2 4600+ 2.4GHz Dual Core; 1408Mb hash >>- Fruit using Shredder GUI and its own book >>- Junior with 3,4,5 and 138Gb of 6-man tablebases >>- Time Control: 40 in 120, 20 in 60, rest in 30 >> >>Game 14: Fruit wins >>Game 15: draw >>Game 16: Junior wins (first of the match) >> >>Fruit leads 11.0 - 5.0 (+7 -1 =8) and needs 1.5 points from 8 to take the match. > > >Hello Peter, > >Thanks a lot for the update... > >I love to join and watch such interesting matches on super fast computers !! > >I see that Deep Junior 9 uses both cores and even this processor addvantage does >not help to DJ9 !! > >Best, >Sedat I am not sure if the use of 1408 Mbytes is an advantage for Junior. Note that programs usually are not tested in these conditions and I doubt if Amir has so much hash to use in his tests so it is possible that Junior is weaker from too much hash tables. I remember that Junior blundered by avoiding Rxe6 in one of the games and it is possible that using too much hash was one of the reasons for that. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.