Author: Daniel Mehrmannn
Date: 06:00:25 10/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2005 at 06:40:06, Tord Romstad wrote: >On October 27, 2005 at 04:45:09, Joachim Rang wrote: > >>Did you ever try to discriminate between good and bad captures? Not reducing bad >>captures seems questionable to me since they should be "bad". > >I have been thinking about it and made some experiments, but so far it hasn't >worked well. Reducing captures just seems too risky, but perhaps this is just >because I haven't found a sufficiently good definition of "bad captures" yet. >Just using the SEE values is definitely not enough. I suspect that the chances >of success are best with some kind of futility-like condition. > >Tord Hi Tord, maybe it would be easier if you tell us which moves you don't reduce in the future ;))))))))))))))))))))))))))))) Sorry, ich coudn't resist. Best, Daniel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.