Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:49:21 10/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: > > > Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! 1)How do you know that there are not cracked version of fruit? I think that you never can know something like that and you may know only the opposite. The best that you can say is that you did not find a cracked version of fruit. 2)I thought first that it is a good idea but I changed my mind about it after reading a lot of complaints in this forum and after understanding that there is probably no copy protection that cannot be cracked by crackers and I think that the fact that the copy proterction of fruit cannot be cracked by most people(and maybe by most crackers) does not help much because one cracker may share fruit with a lot of people. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.