Author: Richard Sutherland
Date: 17:09:02 10/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: > > Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! > I don't mind the copy protection as long as a patch is issued when the copy protection has finished serving it's purpose. That way, I don't end up with a program that cant be used on a system change if the programmer has stopped doing business. The probable reason you haven't seen a crack for Fruit is because it has a very limited audience. One wonders, in this case, if the copy protection has actually contributed at all to sales, which would have been limited to computer chess enthusiasts anyway.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.