Author: Ryan B.
Date: 18:05:23 10/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2005 at 20:51:30, Roger Brown wrote: >On October 28, 2005 at 18:49:21, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >>>is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >>>the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >>>there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! >> >>1)How do you know that there are not cracked version of fruit? >>I think that you never can know something like that and you may know only the >>opposite. >>The best that you can say is that you did not find a cracked version of fruit. >> >>2)I thought first that it is a good idea but I changed my mind about it after >>reading a lot of complaints in this forum and after understanding that there is >>probably no copy protection that cannot be cracked by crackers and I think that >>the fact that the copy proterction of fruit cannot be cracked by most people(and >>maybe by most crackers) does not help much because one cracker may share fruit >>with a lot of people. >> >>Uri > > > >Hello Uri, > >Do you read your posts BEFORE you post them? > >I promised to leave your rather strange posts alone but you are saying a number >of things here that are making me curious. > >(a) Why are you inferring that the poster was searching for cracked versions of >Fruit? > >(b) I cannot understand how the fact that some thief somewhere is working on >cracking Fruit makes the copy protection of Fruit a bad idea. > >(c) One might infer that your statement about the likely procedures of hackers >could be restated (using your own logic of course) as: > >One cannot say that hackers may do or not do this or that, one can only say that >one has received cracked programs in this or that way. I am sure that you have >not received same but you do see that your language leaves the poster's >integrity up for debate. > >Of course, you may complain about this post. > >Later. If someone comes to a programers forum and talks about a programs copy protection not being cracked it seems resonable that some may question their intent.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.