Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Fruit 2.2 and copy protection of Chess Programs

Author: Roger Brown

Date: 18:12:26 10/28/05

Go up one level in this thread



>If someone comes to a programers forum and talks about a programs copy
>protection not being cracked it seems resonable that some may question their
>intent.


Hello Ryan,

Below is the post in its entirety.  The quotes are mine.


"Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there
is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt
the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for
there work? Seems like a good ideal to me!"


It seems clear to me that the poster is expressing nothing but admiration for
the copy protection scheme of Fruit.  Indeed he hopes that it will become
widespread.

Of course I admit that I am not a programmer and my reading of a fairly short
and simple paragraph is perhaps therefore suspect on that score.

My aplogies to Uri *if* that is the case.....

Later.





This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.