Author: P L Patodia
Date: 21:00:54 10/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: > > > Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! There are many programmers who understand machine code like we do C, C++ etc. For them, it is only the question of finding which part of the code is checking the hardware details and then making necessary changes to overcome protection. Further, there are tools available to disassemble and debug the program. In summary, any protection can be broken. Just because, you have not seen any cracked version of the program, it does not mean that it cannot be broken. I run a software company which provide ERP solution to small and medium size company. We part even our source code to all our customers. But, our installation and implementation is so complicated that without detailed guideline and training, it is extremely difficult to install it. P L Patodia
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.