Author: Uri Blass
Date: 21:52:36 10/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 00:00:54, P L Patodia wrote: >On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: > >> >> >> Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >>is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >>the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >>there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! > >There are many programmers who understand machine code like we do C, C++ etc. >For them, it is only the question of finding which part of the code is checking >the hardware details and then making necessary changes to overcome protection. The main problem is that they can get the code. Is it theoretically impossible to have an exe file that does not allow people to see the machine code? Note that I understand nothing about machine code and I even do not know how to get machine code from an exe file. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.