Author: Oliver Roese
Date: 23:47:38 10/28/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 02:16:25, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 29, 2005 at 01:48:04, Oliver Roese wrote:
>
>>On October 29, 2005 at 00:54:31, Ryan B. wrote:
>>
>>>3r3k/1p4p1/4b2p/p1P2p2/1q2p3/4P3/2QNBPPP/4K2R w K a6 0 26
>>>
>>>Do any chess engines see this as a convincing win for black in a reasonable
>>>time? In 5 min blitz a game Fruit 2.2 did not seem to understand this position.
>>> I analyzed it with Spike and also did not get the output I expected. This
>>>lowly human cant be that good.
>>
>>[D] 3r3k/1p4p1/4b2p/p1P2p2/1q2p3/4P3/2QNBPPP/4K2R w K -
>>
>>Using "Tiger Gambit III" i got something like that:
>>
>>1.Bd1 a4 2.O-O Rxd2 3.Qxa4 Qxa4 4.Bxa4 Ra2 5.Be8 Rc2 6.Rb1 Rxc5
>>7.Ba4 Rc4 8.Ra1 {(0:02.28) [=/} $15 {(-0.30)] d=14}
>>
>>Blacks ends up with a solid pawn extra in the endgame. Regarding that he had
>>only one pawn for a minor piece this looks acceptable.
>>
>>Oliver
>
>This line is not correct.
>
>Try 1.Bd1? a4 2.0-0 a3 3.Nb3 Bc4 and white is in big trouble
>
>Uri
One more you got me.
My deepest apologies for the bad qualitie of my line.
Oliver
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.