Author: P L Patodia
Date: 00:09:15 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 00:52:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 29, 2005 at 00:00:54, P L Patodia wrote: > >>On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >>>is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >>>the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >>>there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! >> >>There are many programmers who understand machine code like we do C, C++ etc. >>For them, it is only the question of finding which part of the code is checking >>the hardware details and then making necessary changes to overcome protection. > >The main problem is that they can get the code. >Is it theoretically impossible to have an exe file that does not allow people to >see the machine code? > >Note that I understand nothing about machine code and I even do not know how to >get machine code from an exe file. > >Uri The exe file is nothing but the machine code. That is how the computer is able to execute it. P L Patodia
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.