Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 00:31:42 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2005 at 18:33:56, Tord Romstad wrote: >On October 28, 2005 at 18:00:22, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>"The program has become more human in a different way. It now has extensive >>chess knowledge and a human evaluation structure, ensuring that it finds good >>moves and interesting ideas where there are no direct tactics to guide it. You >>will appreciate the value of this when you analyze with the program. Fritz 9 >>thinks and plans like a human, while retaining the tactical ferocity of the >>world’s top chess engine" www.chessbase.com >> >>You don´t believe this? You think that´s a load of crap? > >I have no idea, and cannot possibly verify it, because I can't even run Fritz >on my computer. However, that the program finds the right moves in a >tiny set of positions like this means nothing at all, even if no other program >solves all the positions. Even for a crappy program like mine, it would >probably >be possible (after some hours of trial and error) to find a few positions where >it >(probably just by chance) finds the right moves more quickly than any other >program. > >I am not saying that you are wrong, mind you. I don't know (and honestly >don't care, because I can't use the program anyway) how strong or human-like >Fritz is. However, you can't expect people to just look at your examples and >believe your claims without further justification. I hope so ;) Michael >Tord
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.