Author: Günther Simon
Date: 01:37:04 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 03:23:45, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On October 28, 2005 at 18:18:33, Günther Simon wrote: ...snip... >>I have not yet looked at the other examples but the first one at least is >>not convincing. >Can you tell me why F9 gives already nearly winning score >>of +1.13, when it is so happy being 'Human' like? >>I can tell you why it does not play dxe5 here and I doubt this is a computer >>typical move at all. >F9 obviously just has a bigger malus for uncastled >>kings in the centre(as after dxe5 Qxd8+ Kxd8 etc...). > >After the trade of Qeens?? > >I thought "knowledgebased" Fritz 9 has now a human evaluation structure. ;) > >Michael> Sorry, I have never seen satiric messages from you before Michael, but I will be warned now for the future ;-) Guenther
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.