Author: William Penn
Date: 03:45:18 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: > > > Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! The copy protection makes me hesitate to buy it, and I have no interest in cracking it. I just don't like to buy software that may have a problem installing in the future - after a computer crash, or if I buy a new computer. Authors and software companies go out of business frequently, then you're stuck with something you paid for but can't use. So maybe I'll stay with Fruit 2.1 which is free and has no protection. WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.