Author: George Speight
Date: 14:20:33 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 10:04:45, Roger Brown wrote: > >>I disagree strongly that Fischer was the strongest player of all time. He did >>shine for a short time but disapearded. In my view it is a lot more important to >>have a long domination over the chess world. In addition I think a lot of >>players have been a lot more important bringing forth new plans and ideas to the >>chess world. So at least Kasparov, Botvinnik, Alechine, Lasker and Karpov was >>better and stronger and have a lot bigger significanse for chess than Bobby >>Fisher. >> >>Torstein > > > > > >Hello Torstein, > >What? No Capablanca? > >:-) > >It goes on and on... > >Later. i respect the opinions, but strongly disagree. So does Kasparov. But this could easily lead down the wrong path to an argument neither of us would have any way of winning- i.e. could Muhammed Ali beat Rocky Marciano. Regards, George
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.