Author: gerold daniels
Date: 18:29:07 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 17:20:33, George Speight wrote: >On October 29, 2005 at 10:04:45, Roger Brown wrote: > >> >>>I disagree strongly that Fischer was the strongest player of all time. He did >>>shine for a short time but disapearded. In my view it is a lot more important to >>>have a long domination over the chess world. In addition I think a lot of >>>players have been a lot more important bringing forth new plans and ideas to the >>>chess world. So at least Kasparov, Botvinnik, Alechine, Lasker and Karpov was >>>better and stronger and have a lot bigger significanse for chess than Bobby >>>Fisher. >>> >>>Torstein >> >> >> >> >> >>Hello Torstein, >> >>What? No Capablanca? >> >>:-) >> >>It goes on and on... >> >>Later. > i respect the opinions, but strongly disagree. So does Kasparov. But this could >easily lead down the wrong path to an argument neither of us would have any way >of winning- i.e. could Muhammed Ali beat Rocky Marciano. Regards, George Cassius Clay could. :) Good luck,Gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.