Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:54:39 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2005 at 01:51:01, g simmons wrote: >Hello again all, >I did some analysis testing of a couple random positions and the result was the >exact some moves and scoring evaluations from fruit 2.2 and 2.21. >I think any engine match between the two would likely only reflect the opening >book that was used. As far as endings go, since I used 2.2 in chessbase gui >anyway, couldn't it use tablebases via the GUI? If so, its 100% the same, if not >2.21 might have a 10-20 elo advantage from the endgames. Using tablebases is done not only at the root and when the root position is not tablebases position 2.2 cannot use tablebases under chessbase gui when 2.21 can use them. There are no more differences between the engines. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.