Author: Uri Blass
Date: 22:58:34 10/29/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2005 at 01:54:39, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 30, 2005 at 01:51:01, g simmons wrote: > >>Hello again all, >>I did some analysis testing of a couple random positions and the result was the >>exact some moves and scoring evaluations from fruit 2.2 and 2.21. >>I think any engine match between the two would likely only reflect the opening >>book that was used. As far as endings go, since I used 2.2 in chessbase gui >>anyway, couldn't it use tablebases via the GUI? If so, its 100% the same, if not >>2.21 might have a 10-20 elo advantage from the endgames. > >Using tablebases is done not only at the root and when the root position is not >tablebases position 2.2 cannot use tablebases under chessbase gui when 2.21 can >use them. > >There are no more differences between the engines. > >Uri I can add that if you want bigger strength improvement then you probably need to wait for Fruit2.3 I hope that we are going to see fruit2.3 in the next 2 months and that fruit2.3 will be at least 50 elo better than fruit2.2. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.