Author: Henrik Dinesen
Date: 01:14:53 10/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 06:45:18, William Penn wrote: >On October 28, 2005 at 18:21:37, Jake Sisko wrote: > >> >> >> Is Fruit 2.2 copy protection scheme the trend of the Future? I hear that there >>is not one cracked version of the program. Perhaps Other companies will adopt >>the same practices of Fruit to ensure that programmers actually get paid for >>there work? Seems like a good ideal to me! > >The copy protection makes me hesitate to buy it, and I have no interest in >cracking it. I just don't like to buy software that may have a problem >installing in the future - after a computer crash, or if I buy a new computer. >Authors and software companies go out of business frequently, then you're stuck >with something you paid for but can't use. So maybe I'll stay with Fruit 2.1 >which is free and has no protection. >WP I don't share your concern in this case, simply because I trust the people behind Fruit and their good intentions. They've promised that if they were unable to continue, they give their customers an unlock-key. I believe in that :) The time spent with Fruit so far, has been a good one :-)) Regards Henrik
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.