Author: Peter Kasinski
Date: 07:09:29 10/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2005 at 08:45:27, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: >On October 30, 2005 at 08:36:48, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 30, 2005 at 08:27:29, Kim Roper Jensen wrote: >> >>>On October 30, 2005 at 08:11:25, Gregory Owett wrote: >>> >>>>On October 30, 2005 at 07:32:17, Peter Kasinski wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 30, 2005 at 07:18:11, Gregory Owett wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>The v.UCI of Shredder 9 uses only one of two processors >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>This is a false statement. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>, while his twin brother, >>>>>>version CB, like all the native engines, benefits 100% from the processors. >>>>>>Thus the second is much more interesting under CB. I do not know if it is the >>>>>>same thing under other GUI. >>>>>> >>>>>>Gregory >>>> >>>> >>>>This is a true statement !!! >>>> >>>>On my machine, a AMD 64x2 dual core 4800+, when I use Sh 9 UCI, the taskmgr >>>>indicates : 50% for Shredder and 50% for "Processus inactif du système". When >>>>I use Fritz, it indicates 99% for Fritz. >>> >>>Have you tried to look under the UCI options after the option called threads(i >>>think its called that) set it to 2 and you should use both cores. >> >> >>There is no option that is called threads for shredder9 >>I guess that there is an option that is called threads for deep shredder9 but >>the word deep was not mentioned in this thread. >> >>Uri > > >So it seems to be a mixup of the deep shredder for CB and Shredder UCI ?` > >That will teach me to read carefully before i answer :) The mixup was well hidden. It seems the "discovery" has to do with the comparison between Deep versio for CB and "Shallow" version under Shredder GUI. The Deep version wins (like duh). :-) PK
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.