Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 15:07:18 10/30/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2005 at 09:13:11, Torstein Hall wrote: >On October 29, 2005 at 03:25:46, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On October 28, 2005 at 19:09:12, Bertil Eklund wrote: >> >>>On October 28, 2005 at 18:00:22, Drexel,Michael wrote: >>> >>>Of course this whole article is a joke and with an ad in the end. >>> >>>The idea is that noone should buy Fritz after one dubious move and four losses. >> >>No, that´s not the idea. Read the text from Chessbase.com. >>I certainly don´t mind if people buy Fritz 9 but I can´t stand being taken for a >>fool. >> >>Michael > >Why do you feel taken for a fool if you find 4 bad games from Fritz and a few >positions where Fritz do not play the best move? (And at least the first Does not find the best move? That´s putting it mildly. In the examples it either played or suggested illogical moves which a strong human does not even consider. Fritz simply has now a much more speculative eval than the early previous version 8. This doesn´t make the style more human-like IMHO. postion >is well within Fritzes opening book and will not be condidered under normal >play!) It is still one of the top programs out there and as far as I can see >must be a great imporvment on version 8. And just wait until the bug fix is >here..... > >Torstein I don´t care much about improved engine-engine strength. The Bug has no influence on opening or middle game evaluation. Michael > >> >>> >>>Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.