Author: Henrik Dinesen
Date: 01:34:37 10/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2005 at 15:30:17, Ómar Skúlason wrote: >On October 30, 2005 at 14:03:00, billiau wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>Are you sure about the conditions ? >>Arena 1.1. Ponder Off. 128 Mo Hash. Harry Schnapp little book for all. >>(CPU AMD XP 3000+) >> >>What is your CPU ? >> >>I played 100 games in this condition and i had the results already mentionned. >>Your result seems very strange considering we only change (a little) only one >>parameter. >> >>Thanks for your report but i can't understand why we have so differents results. >> >>G. Billiau > >Billiau, here are my conditions; > >1 Fruit2.2 16,0/25 >2 Fruit2.2 KS 104 9,0/25 > >25 of 50 games played >Tournament start: 2005.10.30, 13:23:59 >Latest update: 2005.10.30, 18:26:53 >Level: Blitz 5/1 64 Mb hash. >Hardware: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3200+ 2,00 GHz with 1472 MB Memory >Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 2600) >PGN-File: Fruit2.2_KS104.pgn >Table created with: Arena 1.1 >and Harry´s little book was used, ponder OFF. >So you see that our conditions are very similar, the only difference being >that I use 64 Mb hash instead of yours 128. And I don´t think that´s relevant >for this test. > >I guess that the difference would be smaller if I played all 50 games. >But after this poor start I gave up. >Note that we need at least 300 games (Kurt) to see something concrete. > >Ómar. Just a suggestion: Wouldn't it be an idea to play against other engines. It's hard to see anything proven here about the kingsafety of Fruit. Regards Henrik
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.