Author: Maurizio Monge
Date: 06:24:09 10/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2005 at 06:16:54, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >This is something i have thought about for a while. > >The idea to have an open scource program i guess is so people can learn how the >structure of a chess program works, through a practical example and to provide >some insights into some of the deeper aspects of how it all works. > >Now for me atleast i think that Crafty has been such an example of the above and >wouldn't it be time for it to not be open scource anymore? >I mean people should be able to get from it (legally) what they need from >previous open scource versions of Crafty right? > >It would be very interesting to see if it would have any detectable impact on >the computer chess community as a whole if Crafty was not open scource anymore >and to see if Crafty would do better in tournaments in the future. > >Now this, like the header states, is just an idea and it might be for completely >different reasons than i can fathom that Bob keeps Crafty open scource, but it >would make for a nice experiment :) > >Regards >Jonas Boh, i don't understand how not releasing the source of Crafty would make it stronger versus, say, Shredder, Fritz, etc. Probably the only way an amateur/researcher can compete with commercial engines is actually sharing ideas with other amateurs/researchers, this is what Bob did and, at least, he gained the huge popularity he now has (on the other side i don't even know who are the authors of Shreder and Fritz). That's why i'm going to release my small chess engine as GPL, even if actually it has very little possibilities of gaining any attention. :) Ciao Maurizio
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.