Author: William Penn
Date: 08:39:45 10/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2005 at 03:36:03, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 30, 2005 at 19:23:44, William Penn wrote: > >>I don't know. I'm a newbie at running engine matches so don't understand a lot. >>For example I don't see any mention of the many variables in your match >>conditions. > > >http://f50.parsimony.net/forum200336/messages/5331.htm > >as shown: > >Celeron 2400, toga with ju9 book, s9 with s9 book. > > > >>Also I don't know what your time control means: 40'/40+40'/40+40'40 >>0. > > >it is 40 moves in 40 minutes ... > >And sorry but I don't understand German very well. But in general, it looks >>like Fruit 2/2.2/2.2.1 and its variations such as Toga II 1.0 [Pascal] are >>scoring well vs Shredder 9 in the various engine matches I've seen so far. > >yes. thats true. My match is now up to 70 games and Fruit 2.2.1 is leading Shredder 9.1 UCI by 37 game points to 33 game points. fruit 2.2.1 1010===01= 10==000=01 1110010110 1011101110 =0=1 1=1001=00= 00=10=01=1 10=111 37 52.9% shredder 9.1 0101===10= 01==111=10 0001101001 0100010001 =1=0 0=0110=11= 11=01=10=0 01=000 33 47.1% per x games: fruit/shredr 5/5 3½/6½ 6/4 7/3 2/2 4½/5½ 4½/5½ 4½/1½ 70 100.0% WP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.