Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 14:58:04 10/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2005 at 17:33:36, Dann Corbit wrote: >On October 31, 2005 at 17:10:10, William Kerr wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>If you had the choice of running one top program on a CPU that ran at 3x speed >>or three different top programs each running on one CPU at x speed. Which would >>be better for analysis or game play. In the 2nd case one could vote on the >>choice of move if two out of three programs pick the same move. > >Take the scenario with three engines and run it three times as long. Then you >have the best of both worlds (long time analysis and different opinions as >well). > >As for your original problem: >Sometimes the first will be better and sometimes the second. I would always opt for the second for analysis. One engine is not capable of understanding all positions of chess (even not Fruit) ;-). I prefer to go into the variations and see how the different engines "react". That gives me soon a clue which engine has the best perspective and I can set up a long time analysis. Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.