Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:54:15 10/31/05
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2005 at 18:05:22, stuart taylor wrote: >On October 31, 2005 at 17:33:36, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On October 31, 2005 at 17:10:10, William Kerr wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>If you had the choice of running one top program on a CPU that ran at 3x speed >>>or three different top programs each running on one CPU at x speed. Which would >>>be better for analysis or game play. In the 2nd case one could vote on the >>>choice of move if two out of three programs pick the same move. >> >>Take the scenario with three engines and run it three times as long. Then you >>have the best of both worlds (long time analysis and different opinions as >>well). >> >>As for your original problem: >>Sometimes the first will be better and sometimes the second. > >This is an extremely typical kind of cool "Dan Corbit" answer! > >And if you have all 3, I wonder if it will cover what a human can think up. I doubt it will include all possible human answers (e.g. some of the Nolot positions are still very difficult for computers).
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.